This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
A majority of U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical of the Biden Administration's legal authority to implement a COVID-19 vaccination-or test mandate with the depth and breadth of the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration's emergency temporary standard, as they heard arguments on Jan. 7 from government proponents and state and business opponents to the rule, set to take effect on Jan. 10 for employers with 100 or more in their workforces.
The emergency standard, released in November, has been fast-tracked to the high court through numerous challenges and varying decisions in lower courts on its need and statutory foundation that have left the rule in legal limbo.